Jürg Bühlmann, Attorney-at-Law, on FATCA
Wednesday, March 9 2011
FATCA, the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, has been stirring the banking industry for some time now. While the implementing rules still need to be finalized, its main elements and its grave ramifications are more or less clear at this point: Unless a so-called „foreign financial institution“ enters into an agreement with the IRS, a 30% withholding tax will be applied to all withholdable payments made to the institution. Under such agreement, the financial institution undertakes to identify its US clients and to report them to the IRS. Simply put, it will become very difficult for banks to conduct business with US citizens or other persons or institutions covered by FATCA (e.g. green card holders, companies with substantial US shareholders, and others). In addition, being non-compliant with FATCA would not only affect a bank’s US clients, but also a substantial part of its other clients, such as clients holding US securities. Doing business with US persons or not, non-compliance will not be an option for most banks.
However, becoming and remaining compliant comes at a substantial operational cost, i.e. effort. Reporting to the IRS will need to be set up, clients will have to be contacted - some of them being obliged to waive for example Swiss banking secrecy - and internal mechanisms (including IT mechanisms) ensuring the identification of US persons will have to be created. In light of this, implementation time is very short, facing the January 1, 2013 deadline. Nevertheless, FATCA is not impossible to handle, but banks are well advised to get up to speed and put together a project team that familiarizes itself with all requirements quickly.
In this interview, we will go into more detail with Jürg Bühlmann, attorney-at-law with a focus on banking regulation, and explore the cornerstones of FATCA, its effects on banks, as well as some of the options banks are facing in this context.
Michael Stoeckli
Popularity: 56% [?]










April 26th, 2011 at 12:33 pm
Hello! Freezing would want to give your huge thumbs up for those great info you have here in this particular post. I will be returning to your blog post to get more detail soon.
July 26th, 2011 at 9:38 pm
Good an very informative post. I will come back to your blog regullary. One thing: I do not exactly know what do you mean in the second paragraph. Could you please exmplain your opinion?
July 27th, 2011 at 7:50 am
To clarify the second paragraph: compliance with FATCA includes the actual reporting of US persons to the US authorities.
For this, the US persons withing a bank’s client portfolio need to be identified first, leading to a certain operational complexity (such as client reviews, data analysis following the “electronically searchable indicia”, etc.)
Secondly - at least under Swiss banking law - client’s need to give their bank permission to disclose their name to the US authorities. In order to obtain this permission, each US person needs to be contacted in order to sign such a waiver - which of course is another operational issue in the end. Btw, FATCA obliges banks to terminate relationships with clients who do not want their names to be disclosed (called recalcitrant account holders).
August 18th, 2011 at 8:21 am
It’s good blog. Good work.
September 8th, 2011 at 3:29 pm
Thnks for shring such useful informtion.Will definitely come bck once more